Home > News > Talcott Parsons
30 Jan

Talcott Parsons

Posted by Comments off

In other words, to the actions that are logical subjective and objective only in the explained direction. Other actions we go to call not-logics (by no means we must call them ' ' ilgicas' ')' ' (PARETO, 1935) Even so it does not define explicit the word action, the same one seems to assign the total complex of concrete phenomena that understands the life of the human beings in society in relation ones with the others, seen of combined the objective and subjective points of view. The peculiar way in which Vilfredo Pareto carried through the task of if studying the logical and not logical actions is of extreme importance for the understanding of its theory. To know more about this subject visit Gina Bonati. Talcott Parsons affirms: ' ' For preliminary analytical intentions, Pareto does not have none another interest in the logical action. It does not come back to consider it until its synthetic treatment of the social phenomena in the final part of the treated one arrives. Having if abstracted of the logical action, it intensively continues studying the action not lgica' ' (PARSONS, 2010) In the logical actions, the objective end is identical to the subjective end and the actions possess in such a way objective a logical end how much subjectively. No longer group of the actions not-logics, whose objective end it is different of the subjective end, some peculiarities must be observed. This group can be divided in four sub-groups, to follow: 1: the actions do not possess logical end objective nor subjectively (no-no).

2: the actions do not possess logical end objective, they possess but it subjectively (not-yes). 3: the actions possess logical end objective, but they do not possess it subjectively (yes-not). 4: the actions possess logical end in such a way objective how much subjectively (yes-yes). The first sort (no-no) affirms that the ways are not related to the ends.

Categories: News
Comments are closed.