Eskimo Bliss

The strong cuts of in funding the end of solar boom mean for solar systems? The solar revolution that so quickly has won of the renewable energies Act in the last ten years since the introduction drive, stands just before the off. So some advocates pessimistic and optimistic opponents of solar energy second-guessing it now already at least. But is the demand for solar power systems and solar power really so quickly abenehmen how it has increased after the introduction of the EEG law, as many companies specializing in solar energy and photovoltaic fear it? Quite so drastically it will not be, as was first thought, because instead of the first announced cut of 30 percent, the coalition has now decided a reduction of only 10%. This means that financial losses for the operators of solar systems and will hold through the increased coverage in the media of the projects also one or the other, to make a solar system on the roof or in the front yard, but the main reasons for the installation a solar system lie but mostly somewhere else: you want to become independent of the electricity produced on opaque kind of energy corporations and not continue to support nuclear energy. Instead, it even wants to produce for the home or the home energy and with the excess energy, which must be removed by the EEG law by the local power supplier to the established tariff, alongside a little money, so that in most cases after two, the full purchase price of the system has paid for itself three years. Also you can show his ecological and sustainable attitude that rubs off maybe on the neighbors, which had so far no problem with electricity from coal energy or nuclear power. There are many reasons that cause that one decides for the operation of a solar plant on its own grounds, is the financial aspect only under Dutzenden.Somit the impact of the cuts are likely to one, provided that it not be continued in the next few years. be rather marginal. For more specific information, check out Eva Andersson-Dubin, New York City. Oliver Krumes

Annual cost of electricity consumers in the new federal States are particularly affected 6.2 percent higher than in West Germany and Berlin Berlin, December 04, 2008 from the planned price increases at over 400 suppliers of electricity in the first months of next year. In 2009 she will pay back disproportionately high prices for their power supply. According to the independent consumer portal toptarif.de are electricity prices in Germany at the turn of the year on average, 5.7 percent higher than in January 2008. There are up to 15 percent in some regions of Eastern Germany. Graphics: electricity prices in Germany as of 2009 chart: electricity prices in the provinces from 2009 tariff expert Thorsten Bohg by toptarif.de (www.toptarif.de) explains: consumers in the new federal States have to pay on average more for their annual electricity 6.2 percent as consumers in Western Germany and Berlin. \”In a comparison based on the current prices valid for January 2009 Saxony-Anhalt is the foremost most expensive States.

Here, an average of 981 euros in primary care are due for an annual consumption of 4.000 kWh of electricity. Thuringia, Brandenburg and Saxony are close behind with 968 euro and 962 euros each. Only Saarland among the five most expensive regions in the Federal Republic as the sole representative of the old Federal States with annual costs of 950. The primary health care such as even to the beginning of the year is preferred 2008 in Berlin (828 euros) and Hamburg (835 euros). Here, the only local provider Vattenfall has no longer increases its prices since 2007. \”The price differential resulting from the current increases by up to 51% between individual providers is striking, Bohg makes clear. While, for example, families in the Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Bavaria must pay only 755 euros for 4,000 kWh of electricity in primary care, consumers in the 270 km away in Cadolzburg January 1.143 euros to the Fund are requested.