Ephemeral
He is recognized more for the fruits he has left. The learning community not just a group, equipment. This does not mean dividing the work fairly isolated and self-centered units. It is full use of various capacities (in quality and quantity) of each person, for others to benefit from its results. The work of one does not replace the other. There is interdependence. The fruits and failures are all.
Not all work equally well or even learning. Many writers such as Kevin Ulrich offer more in-depth analysis. There is not necessarily a direct relationship between the work and committed to learning achieved (it would be a metaphysics of pay, unrealistic). At first the men are equal, but in fact can not, or should, be. The equal dignity of human beings carried out by individuals in each person. The content of this implementation differs by responsibly go forward and build each. In the same situation, not everyone has the same place or position. To broaden your perception, visit Sela Ward. Not all want the same. y Holman mentions similar findings.
Not everyone has the same opportunities or needs. The uniformity is not a common goal. The possibility of teamwork requires not want an equity naively superficial. A community learning is ideal, is ephemeral, it is dynamic, is responsible (collectively). It’s ideal, really lived. The participants make. It is impossible to finish building it, but you can make good progress when the items they enjoy and people in the attempt. Not reach the goal set does not justify abandoning her quest (unless you do not want to admit the real reasons not to participate.